Tuesday, 24 February 2009

Call for Comment: ARMA International's Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles

ARMA International’s Board of Directors has approved a set of generally accepted recordkeeping principles (GARP) for member and public comment. These principles will serve as a framework for guidance in implementing information management programs. The defined set of principles will help business leaders, legislators, the judiciary, and other stakeholders understand and adress the key components of records and information management as a discipline and as a best business practice.

You can view and comment on the proposed principles at www.arma.org/GARP. Please use the e-mail address at the bottom of each page (garp@arma.org) for any comments regarding the supporting principle narratives. The comment period for GARP will end on Friday, March 6.
On behalf of ARMA International and the profession, thank you in advance for your participation in this exciting endeavor.

Thursday, 19 February 2009

Offer to ARMA Members: Discounted Rate on RMS Conference

ARMA is pleased to announce that it is supporting the annual conference of the Record Management society of Great Britain which will take place on 19-21 April in Brighton (UK). As a result, ARMA members are able to register at the same rates as RMS members:


For more information on the conference and the conference programme, please visit http://www.rms-gb.org.uk/conference.To book, please visit http://www.rms-gb.org.uk/conference-delegates-2009, select the member rate and mention the word 'ARMA' when asked for a membership number on the booking form (only the word not the quotes). ARMA will also be present at the exhibition with a booth.

Wednesday, 18 February 2009

EU Data protection group publishes pre-trial discovery guidance

The Article 29 Working Party, an EU data protection watchdog, has published a guidance document on pre-trial discovery for cross border civil litigation.

This working document provides guidance to data controllers subject to EU Law in dealing
with requests to transfer personal data to another jurisdiction for use in civil litigation. The
Working Party has issued this document to address its concern that there are different applications of Directive 95/46 (Data Protection Directive) in part as a result of the variety of approaches to civil litigation across the Member States.

In the first section of this document the Working Party briefly sets out the differences in
attitudes to litigation and in particular the pre-trial discovery process between common law
jurisdictions such as the United States and the United Kingdom and civil code jurisdictions.

The document goes on to set out guidelines for EU data controllers when trying to reconcile the demands of the litigation process in a foreign jurisdiction with the data protection obligations of Directive 95/46.

Download the full document here: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2009/wp158_en.pdf

Friday, 13 February 2009

Fresh start for lost file formats

Long lost file formats could soon be resurrected by pan-European research.
The 4.02m euro (£3.58m) project aims to create a universal emulator that can open and play obsolete file formats.

Read the entire article here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7886754.stm

Deutsche Bahn accused of spying on own staff

Deutsche Bahn is in deep trouble. Not only has the state-owned operator had to postpone a recent planned part-privatisation because of the financial crisis., the BBC reports. Now it is also accused of spying on its own staff.

Berlin's data protection commissioner and prosecutors are currently conducting an investigation into the affair over any breaches of data protection.

Read the article here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7887017.stm

ARMA Foundation Newsletter

Check out the latest newsletter of the ARMA Educational Foundation here: http://content.delivra.com/etapcontent/ARMAInternationalEducational/March09FoundationHighlights.pdf

Thursday, 12 February 2009

Commission dismantles data watchdog group

Group ‘compromised' by US interests; expert group met only once.
The European Commission has disbanded a group of experts that was supposed to review EU data protection legislation, following complaints in the French parliament that the body comprised people “representing American interests”.

The group of five experts, one of whom works for Google and another for Intel, was disbanded at the end of January – just over a month after the group first met – despite having been set up for a one-year renewable term. Alex Türk, a French senator and the chairman of data protection supervisors from the 27 member states, is understood to have complained about the group to Jacques Barrot, his compatriot, who is the European commissioner for justice, freedom and security.

French senate
Türk had raised the matter on 25 November in the French national assembly's European affairs committee and then raised it again in the French senate's equivalent committee last week (3 February). The senate committee was told that the group of experts was “composed of four-fifths of personalities representing American interests in order to reflect on the revision of the European directive of 1995 relating to the protection of personal data”, according to a report from the hearing on the French senate's website.
The committee proposed a resolution stating that it was “unacceptable” that four members of the group “are either from American companies or law firms whose principal establishment is in the US”.

Working language
The resolution also said that it was unacceptable that the working language of the group was English, as set down in its terms of reference.
Türk told the senate committee that he had spoken to Barrot about the group and he had admitted the “situation was abnormal”. Barrot had suggested forming a larger group of experts, but had yet to confirm if this could be done, Türk added. “Europeans must note that the gap is big between the American vision and the European vision,” Türk told the committee.
A spokesman for Barrot denied that any pressure was put on the commissioner to disband the group. He said that Barrot had wanted to broaden the consultation on the review of data protection laws beyond a small group of experts. “We were happy with passing on to the next level and a broader dimension was clearly seen. It's in the sense of having a broader approach,” he said. A letter dated 23 January from Barrot to Türk refers to the broader consultation and a series of conferences, adding that the expert group “will not last beyond the launch” of such a consultation.

Barrot's spokesman said that it was not unusual for an expert group set up by the Commission with a one-year mandate to be disbanded after one meeting.

‘No nationality issue'
The spokesman also denied the composition of the group and the nationality of the experts had any bearing on the decision to disband it. “You have to gather expertise in this globalised technical field and have people that can reflect and have knowledge of new technology,” he said.
The group's experts, who were not paid for their services, were selected after a tendering process and included: Peter Fleischer, global privacy counsel for Google; David Hoffman, director of security policy and global privacy officer for Intel; Henriette Tielemans a privacy lawyer with Covington and Burling, a US law firm; Christopher Kuner, a privacy lawyer with Hunton and Williams, a US law firm; and Jacob Kohnstamm, chairman of the Dutch data protection authority.

Information listing the members of the group and the text of the tendering process were taken off the Commission's website this week without any mention that the group had been disbanded.

Source: European Voice